Yes, I am aware that you can adjust that setting.
These portable devices ( to conserve power) turn off the screen after a short interval. However, a proper secure screenlock involves a complex password ( not a pin or pattern) which is time consuming to have to constantly be entering. I am very aware of the security risks and I accept the responsibility. The only issue I have is with Microsoft Authenticator’s requirement for a screenlock in order to be able to use the autofill features (Passwords, Payments, Addresses & Credentials). and last but not least, it has a search feature.Can be seen when accessed from a screen sharing device and screenshots can be taken.Cloud based backup and restore feature (can even be used to sync between devices, but be EXTREMELY CAREFUL!).For example, sort by name ( ascending or descending). Google Authenticator was constantly pausing and stuttering on me as I scrolled. Better performance for those of us with many accounts.Some of the benefits of Microsoft Authenticator over Google Authenticator include: So I started out with only a few everyday accounts and once I obtained greater confidence I made the full conversion over. After all, I have over 80 accounts to manually port over. It may also be worth noting that Microsoft Authenticator currently has a 4.6 star rating whereas Google Authenticator only has a 3.7 rating.Įven with that, I was reluctant to switch over. Recently switched my 80+ Two Factor Authentication Accounts application from Google Authenticator to Microsoft Authenticator on my Android phone and am very happy with the switch.
0 kommentar(er)
